Relationship between Teachers’ Digital Competence and Classroom Teaching Practices
Keywords:
digital competence, classroom teaching practices, digital pedagogy, teacher professional development, ICT integration, secondary educationAbstract
The growing presence of digital technologies in schools has made teachers’ digital competence a central concern for education systems, yet the extent to which this competence is reflected in everyday classroom teaching remains insufficiently understood. The present study examined the relationship between teachers’ digital competence and their classroom teaching practices among secondary and higher secondary school teachers. A descriptive correlational survey design was adopted, and data were collected from a sample of 120 teachers selected through stratified random sampling from government and private schools. Two self-developed and validated instruments were used: a Teachers’ Digital Competence Scale (25 items, five dimensions) and a Classroom Teaching Practices Scale (20 items, four dimensions). Both instruments showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .907 and .898 respectively). Data were analysed in SPSS using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons, and multiple linear regression. The results showed that teachers possessed a moderate level of digital competence (M = 3.43, SD = 0.51) and a moderately high level of classroom teaching practices (M = 3.57, SD = 0.50). A strong, positive and significant correlation was found between digital competence and classroom teaching practices (r = .676, p < .001). No significant differences were observed by gender or type of school, whereas teaching experience produced significant differences in both digital competence and teaching practices, with less experienced teachers scoring higher. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the five dimensions of digital competence together explained 49.5% of the variance in classroom teaching practices, with digital pedagogy (β = .423) and digital safety and ethics (β = .216) emerging as significant predictors. The study concludes that pedagogically oriented digital competence, rather than technical skill alone, is most closely linked to quality classroom teaching, and it recommends professional development programmes that integrate technology with pedagogy.
References
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. Springer.
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J.-J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449.
Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567.
Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247.
Instefjord, E., & Munthe, E. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: An analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 77–93.
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196.
Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280.
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing.
Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education: A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 250–280.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202–214.
Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, 92–93, 1–14.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


